Discriminative Practices of arxiv.org: The Search for Inclusive Peer Review
The scientific community thrives on peer review—an essential step for validating groundbreaking theories. However, platforms like arxiv.org impose restrictive endorsement requirements, excluding independent researchers who are not affiliated with universities. Without a university email or established endorsements, innovative contributions such as UUSTE remain excluded from timely peer review, severely limiting their visibility and recognition.
Historically, this pattern isn’t new. Albert Einstein faced rejection and exclusion for five years after publishing his revolutionary 1905 papers, primarily because he lacked formal university affiliation. A century later, has the situation improved? Unfortunately, not significantly. High-profile journals like Nature Physics often reject groundbreaking ideas, not due to their scientific merits, but because they do not align closely enough with established viewpoints, despite acknowledging them as “thought-provoking.”
UUSTE has been submitted to Zenodo for peer review, but traditional peer-review methods remain slow (3-6 months) and biased towards academics on university payrolls. This emphasizes a pressing need for unbiased, rapid, and accessible peer-review methods.
In the near future, artificial intelligence-driven peer review offers a promising solution. AI can review complex theories objectively, rapidly (in less than an hour), and without bias related to institutional affiliations. Such a system would democratize scientific validation, ensuring ideas are judged purely on their merit.
An explicit call is thus made to esteemed journals and readers who value innovation and objectivity: if you are willing and prepared to peer-review the groundbreaking UUSTE theory for a reputable journal, please contact the author directly at blankertjp@gmail.com.
The future of physics depends on openness, objectivity, and inclusivity. It is time we demand peer-review processes that embody these principles, moving beyond discriminatory practices toward a more equitable scientific community.
Conclusion: A New Scientific Era
The paradigm shifts introduced by UUSTE challenge deeply embedded assumptions in contemporary physics, prompting a profound reevaluation of fundamental concepts like entropy, gravity, and spacetime itself. Like the great scientific revolutions preceding it, UUSTE stands to not only reshape our scientific understanding but to inspire entirely new avenues of exploration and discovery. Welcome to the next era in physics.
